Pages

Monday, 3 August 2020

Leadership Candidates Q&A – a Green Left assessment

Leadership Candidates Q&;A – a Green Left assessment


After carrying out an informal analysis of candidates answers to our election questions Green Left believes the candidates below are those closest to the ecosocialist views of Green Left . Green Left  has only identified these candidates on the basis of 4 of the issues covered in its questionnaire and therefore makes no comment on candidates' position on other issues. There is a full commentary in the article below.

Leader : Shahrah Ali, Deputy Leader: Andrea Carey Fuller, Chair: Ashley Routh & Benjamin Smith, Trade Union Liaison OfficerMatthew Hull & Paul Valentine or Theo Simon, Campaign Coordinator : Hannah Graham, Publications Coordinator : Julia Lagoutte, International Coordinator : Alice Hubbard & Sam Murray or Claudine Letsae.

Green Left is pleased to see many ecosocialists standing as well as these above in all the posts and we do urge people to visit our excellent Election Blog to read all the answers to our 10 point Questionnaire , find links to the campaign sites of the leadership candidates and  information on each candidate standing https://greenleftgpelections2020.blogspot.com/


Over the last year or two there has been concern that the Green Party has been moving towards a more centrist position on key questions so this leadership election is a chance to gauge the health of the eco-socialist current within the party.  Two of our questions directly relate to that issue.

Leader

Asked if they were an eco-socialist, leadership candidates offered varied responses. Shahrar Ali gave an unequivocal answer, ‘Yes, climate change action needs radical social, economic and democratic change’; Sian Berry said system change is the core of eco-socialism and co-candidate Jonathan Bartley added action on climate cannot be separated from the economic system. Rosemary Sexton did not use the term eco-socialist but said, ‘social justice and environmental justice are twin pillars of the Green movement.’ She added that it was hard to care about consequences of climate change when you’re worried about paying the rent or putting food on the table.

None of them mentioned capitalism in their answer.

On the connected issue of a Just Transition and support for those campaigning for green jobs Bartley & Berry said the Campaign Against Climate Change et al were key factors in the movement Greens wanted to build and workers must be protected in transition; Sexton called for engagement with people affected in industries becoming obsolete so that solutions can be found together; Ali responded that a move from a neo-liberal to a sustainable and carbon neutral economy needed trade union and campaigning organisation support.

Opposition to the Green Party adopting the IHRA definition is a key policy of Green Left and the issue is likely to be debated at the Autumn Conference.  Sexton made a general statement opposing the oppression of minorities and said that in holding governments to account that this should not become a vehicle for racist tropes. She did not take a position on adoption of the IHRA. Bartley and Berry both supported the IHRA having done so in their councils ‘as a way to avoid anti-Semitism’ within ‘legitimate campaigning’ opposing actions of the Israeli government. They supported BDS.  Ali conversely said that he opposed the IHRA definition as it would prohibit BDS and label criticism of Israel as anti-Semitic.

Lastly Ali, Bartley and Berry supported the proposed motion opposing nuclear power. Sexton said she would not support the motion as in line with ‘that majority of climate and energy scientists and the IPCC, this would be incompatible with climate change commitments.

On the basis of the above Shahrar Ali is closest overall to Green Left’s positions on these four key questions.

Deputy Leader

Amongst Deputy Leader candidates Tom Pashby on eco-socialism says, ‘I am an eco-socialist and an anti-capitalist’; Andrea Carey Fuller says as an eco-socialist she stands for climate justice, human rights, social justice and devolved resources;  Cleo Lake says eco-socialism is understanding that most of the world is in poverty and cannot thrive, ‘nature thrives but is under attack from ecocide’, Nick Humberstone says that he doesn’t have a personal definition of eco-socialism and ‘probably would identify myself as an eco-socialist’; Amelia Womack says she has consistently and proudly stated that she is an eco-socialist and that social justice and equality are intertwined with solutions to the climate crisis.

On Just Transition, Carey Fuller says it is about protecting current workers and future generations whilst we switch from fossil fuels . The Lucas Green Deal is the only one which will halt climate change – Labour’s million jobs plan is ‘greenwash’.  Pashby says action on climate change without Just Transition would be against the party’s values;  Lake argues we can’t take control of government unless we work with a coalition of trade unions setting clear lines on ‘wellbeing and environmental non-negotiables’; while Womack says she has supported the campaigns mentioned and that the need for a Just Transition needs to be at the heart of the GP’s messaging. Humberstone admits he doesn’t know much about the campaigns which perhaps highlights that we’re not supporting them enough. He supports an economy that works for everyone.

On the IHRA Womack does not oppose the definition but says the Queens Speech statement on BDS has to be challenged, ‘It is important we protect Jewish people and their rights as well as criticising leaders who are destroying Palestine’; Lake says that it is important to understand UK Jewish perspectives by working with Jewish Greens as a priority and policy should be membership driven in consultation with them. Humberstone states that he supports BDS and the IHRA. Cary Fuller says she is a co-proposer of the motion opposing the IHRA definition and reaffirming support for BDS. Pashby understand that people say the IHRA is not perfect but supports it as the best working definition of anti-Semitism.

All support the nuclear power motion except for Humberstone who says he approaches every policy with an open mind he would currently ‘probably’ support it but it’s difficult without knowing the specifics.

Carey Fuller’s answers are closest to GL’s positions on the four main questions

House of Lords

Amelia Womack’s answers have already been commented on but there are other candidates to consider for the House of Lords. On Eco-socialism Molly Scott Cato says she is not a great one for labels but has learned a lot from Marx, Keynes and Polanyi – probably a ‘guild socialist’ on William Morris lines. Rupert Read thinks his being on the board of ‘Capitalism, Nature, Socialism’ answers the question; Andrew Cooper says it is unlikely that the present system, to say the least, will solve the crisis so system change is needed. 

Read states that Just Transition is the ‘best chance we have of moving to a truly sustainable economic system’ and to do that we have to challenge existing social stratification.  Cooper says as GP Energy Spokesperson he has engaged with these organisation and would continue the work towards shared values and objectives.  Scott Cato focuses on the message that in leaving nobody behind the government should pay for reskilling and employment conversion and unions involve in national plans for the sustainable transition. We should speak out of unions protecting the jobs of current workers is at the expense of future generations.

None of the candidates oppose the IHRA definition.

This is a hard one to call regarding closeness to GL’s position.

GPEx Chair

Chair of GPEx is a powerful position so has been included in this review. Ewan Jones and the Benjamin Smith and Ashley Routh partnership say they are eco-socialist. Adrian Spurrell says he is a Green and there’s no separation between the economy, society and the environment.  Liz Reason doesn’t use labels.

On Just Transition Jones says it is vital and he commits as Chair to empowering the Trade Union Liaison Officer to build strong alliances with trade unions and campaign with them within agreed policies.  Smith and Routh have no direct experience of the campaigns, knowledge only from reading, but find no substantive disagreement.  Spurrell wants to remove the ‘them and us’ and work for fairer distribution of income and power. Reason expresses disappointment at trade union campaigns failure to address green issues in a meaningful way.

The IHRA produces a split in the Smith and Routh partnership with Smith opposing and Ashley saying it could do with revisions to clarify misconceptions. Spurrell does not clearly support opposition to the IHRA but says he opposes annexation and does not believe criticism of the Israeli government is anti-Semitic. Jones will lead GPEx in implementing whatever policy is agreed. Reason says, ‘Of course, I oppose the oppression of all minorities.’

They all support the nuclear motion but Spurrell also takes a swipe at Chinese ownership as another reason to oppose.

Ewan Jones’ commitment to empowering the Trade Union Liaison Officers puts him ahead of the field in GL policy terms.

Campaigns Co-ordinator

Campaigns Co-ordinator is another key position, particularly as this has been a neglected area outside election work.

Hannah Graham declares herself an eco-socialist and says we cannot stop climate change under capitalism as the need for growth will lead to producing and consuming more and more. Daniel Laycock thinks it means fighting for climate and social justice, including proper education, BAME communities, NHS funding, green economy etc.  Britta Goodman says she is only truly comfortable with the Green label but does see the need to restructure society.

Goodman, regarding Just Transition, would like to see closer links with the trade union movement as it is the only way to a sustainable society. Laycock says the aim should be a Green New Deal and we should reach out to these campaigns and organisations to put structures in place like the Lucas Plan. Graham says we should advocate the Just Transition framework to secure workers’ rights and livelihoods when shifting to sustainable production.

On the IHRA Graham is somewhat ambivalent saying she does not support it in its ‘entirety’ and says the Green Party have faltered in our weak positioning and support for candidates on the issue.  Laycock makes a broad statement of support for the oppressed. Goodman says that as a German she stays out of debates around anti-Semitism as aware that the Nazi past makes many Jews uncomfortable.

All candidates support the nuclear motion.

On balance, Hannah Graham is just ahead in terms of GL policies on the principal topics.

International Co-ordinator

It is good to see plenty of competition for International Co-ordinator including two job shares.

Frank Sheridan does not state that he is an eco-socialist but says that social, economic and democratic inequality are products of a flawed system. The Erwin Schaefer and Alex Horn partnership are split with Schaefer saying he is an eco-socialist and public utilities should be under public control and Horn saying, ‘No, I am in favour of a mixed economy.’  Alice Hubbard and Sam Murray say they are ‘Proud Eco socialists’ and list a number of international politicians they have worked with: ‘Eco socialism for us recognises that system change is necessary to fight climate change.’  Claudine Letsae says that she is a human rights campaigner and sees that economic, social and cultural rights are needed to bring about equity.

All the candidates support Just Transition with Sheridan and Hubbard and Murray emphasising the global and international aspects. Letsae says the party has missed too many opportunities for the right campaigns that would have great impact on people’s livelihoods.

On the IHRA only Letsae opposes the IHRA definition as it is flawed from a Human Rights perspective. Hubbard and Murray say careful and considered debate is needed re adopting or not the definition but all groups facing oppression should be able to articulate their experience.

All support he nuclear motion except for a caveat from Alex Horn who says that we need to consider the consequence of Germany’s closure of nuclear facilities in more burning of coal.



Green Party Trade Union Liaison Officer

Lastly, we will review the candidates’ answers for Green Party Trade Union Liaison Officer, a post that is alleged to face abolition, so it is good to see that it is seen by the membership as important enough to attract three candidates.

Unsurprisingly all three support Just Transition and the Green Party’s work with trade unions.  On being an eco-socialist Paul Valentine and Matthew Hull (Joint candidates) take the strongest anti-capitalist position so far ‘We believe that confronting and defeating the oppression of people and planet requires uprooting the capitalist social order. Capitalism’s impulse to open new markets and frontiers of extraction is responsible for the climate crisis, and this has to be tackled head-on.’  Kefentse Dennis says that it is all about ‘Understanding how to work, live and play sustainably and equally within a finite world.'. Theo Simon hesitates to define it in 50 words but ‘The main levers of production, transport, land and infrastructure need to be publicly owned and democratically managed, along with financial institutions.’

Theo Simon says the IHRA definition is too ambiguous regarding criticism of the Israel state. Kefentse Dennis says he is in favour of the IHRA as it says ‘criticism of Israel similar to that levelled against other states cannot be regarded as anti-Semitic’, Valentine and Hull don’t answer directly but support campaigns rooted in the diaspora communities.  These campaigns may use a variety of tactics, including using boycotts, divestments and sanctions, as a legitimate means of applying pressure.’

All support the nuclear motion.

On the basis of the replies it is too close to call between Theo Simon and the Paul Valentine and Matthew Hull partnership.








No comments:

Post a Comment