Amapondo Zinkomo Phakati Zimbabwe?
by John Andrews /
November 24th, 2017
(Amapondo Zinkomo is an expression for
the early dawn in Sindebele, the language of the Matabele people of Zimbabwe,
who were butchered in their tens of thousands in the early days of the Mugabe
government. The words mean “the horns of the cattle”, and refer to that time in
the early morning were the tips of cattle horns can first be made out against
the lightening sky.)
Watching the TV images of jubilant scenes on the
streets of Harare on the day Robert Mugabe resigned as president of Zimbabwe,
one rather strange thing caught my eye. Not a single policeman was anywhere to
be seen. There were soldiers, but no obvious signs of police.
It’s always very difficult to know what’s really
going on in the so-called news, and trying to discern the truth of the recent
events in Zimbabwe is no different. If Britain’s BBC is to be believed (not
usually advisable) the story goes something like this: Mugabe’s wife, Grace,
had become obsessed with personal power and persuaded Comrade Bob to sack his
number two, Emmerson Mnangagwa, and give her the job instead. This provoked the
army, devoted servants as they are to constitutional protocol, to persuade
Comrade Bob to go, and for Mnangagwa to be properly restored to office. And
that’s all there was to it. But there’s probably a bit more to it than that.
When this story broke I felt two reactions. The
first one was delight, and the second was curiosity as to what’s really going
on: who was really pulling the strings? There were, of course, two prime
suspects: the US or the UK. The UK seemed the most likely possibility in this
case, because Zim used to be a British colony, and therefore Britain knows the
place pretty well, and no doubt still has important links there. Although
Britain seldom does anything without at least a nod from the White House, the
US is possibly quite marginal for a change.
The Zimbabwe Independent (ZI) is a
news provider based in Harare and owned by Alpha Media, which is possibly
linked to an organisation of a similar name in the USA. It has produced a
couple of interesting articles on the coup.
The first of these, published two
months prior to the coup, revealed that:
BRITAIN has reportedly come up with a grand plan to
steer Zimbabwe through its turbulent political transition centred on
Vice-President Emmerson Mnangagwa succeeding President Robert Mugabe with a
US$2 billion economic bailout underwriting the project.
ZI cites “high-level diplomatic sources” for its
information, and claims that British ambassador Catriona
Laing, “is said to have come to Harare in September 2014 with a mission to
rebuild bridges and ensure that re-engagement succeeds to facilitate
Mnangagwa’s rise to power”.
The second interesting piece by ZI, citing “sources
close to the developments”, gives a blow-by-blow account of how the actual coup
is said to have happened. Apparently head of the armed forces, General
Constantino Chiwenga recently visited China – not, presumably, for his
holidays. It seems Chiwenga is a supporter of Mnangagwa, and ZI’s sources
claimed that, on Sunday 12th November:
[T]he police were given instructions to arrest
Chiwenga on arrival at the airport. A team was deployed to arrest him, but
Chiwenga had been informed of the plan by military intelligence,’ an official
said.
The military contemplated landing in Lusaka and
driving from Zambia to avoid arrest, among other options, before eventually
settling on flying straight into Harare.
When Chiwenga came, a team of soldiers dressed in
National Handling Service (NHS) uniforms got inside the airport, while police
positioned themselves to seize him. The soldiers reacted and disarmed them. The
soldiers took off the NHS uniforms, revealing their camouflage fatigues,
resulting in the police officers fleeing.
The following day, Chiwenga gave a press conference
where he:
ordered Mugabe ‘to stop reckless utterances by
politicians from the ruling party denigrating the military’ and halt the
purging of people with a liberation background in Zanu PF.
He called for ‘counter-revolutionary elements’ in
the party to be fished out and for the Zanu PF leadership to ensure that
members go for the extraordinary congress with an equal opportunity.
Next day, Tuesday:
Zanu PF youth leader Kudzanai Chipanga attacked
Chiwenga, labelling him a “rebel” and “criminal” who should be held accountable
for the country’s missing diamond revenue.
Zanu PF spokesperson Simon Khaya Moyo later issued
a statement describing Chiwenga’s utterances as “treasonous”.
The military responded by moving equipment
including tanks into Harare after which it secured strategic places such as the
Munhumutapa Building, which houses the President and his deputies’ offices,
Supreme Court, Parliament and ZBC.
And then things seem to have unfolded pretty much
as reported in MSN – except that we know
nothing yet about the fate of the so-called “criminals”, or the “G40 faction”
upon whom the army was last seen “descending on… between 2am and
2:30am on Wednesday morning.”
Early that same morning, Wednesday, two senior
military officers, Major General Sibusiso Moyo and Air Vice Marshall Jacob
Nzvede, read out a prepared statement on national television. This appears to
have been extremely well-prepared for so early in the morning and, as reported
in the Bulawayo Chronicle, is, mostly, an astounding model of
reason and moderation – not something one would expect from people whose
behaviour over the last three decades or more has often been anything but.
The statement specifically addresses a range of
groups and organisations in Zimbabwe, from MPs, the judiciary, armed forces,
and civil servants to “the generality of the people of Zimbabwe”; from “all
churches and religious organisations” to youth groups, the media, and
traditional leaders. It appears to be very encompassing and unthreatening.
However, there’s one very important group which is not specifically mentioned
at all – the police. There is one reference to “other Security Services“, with a thinly veiled
threat:
We urge you to cooperate for the good of our
country. Let it be clear that we intend to address the human security threats
in our country. Therefore any provocation will be met with an appropriate
response.
We have to wonder if this was why there was no
obvious signs of any police on the streets of Harare on the day Comrade Bob
resigned.
We also have to wonder why, given the quantity of
information about the coup that’s publicly available, the BBC never said a word
about it. Last Sunday, five days into the coup, the BBC’s twenty four hour news
channel had absolutely nothing to tell us, except the events unfolding in
Zimbabwe. The BBC has been banned from Zimbabwe for some years, but they had
journalists in Harare by Sunday who were reporting live from the
capital. Despite the obvious opportunity to be asking these questions, the Beeb
said not one word about the apparent confrontation between the army and the
police at the airport, asked no questions about how the relatively primitive
military intelligence found out the police planned to arrest Chiwenga at the
airport, nor where the police are now, nor the fate of the “G40 faction” who
were “descended on” by the army in the early hours
of Wednesday morning. Almost needless to say, the BBC asked no
questions about the role of the British government, or the two billion dollars
which appear to be bankrolling the coup.
A week later the BBC had caught up a little, and
tucked away on its website was a superficial
reference to the airport confrontation – contained in two
sentences – and probing no deeper into the story.
It is unquestionably a good thing that Mugabe has
been removed from power. I hope that he’s now quickly indicted for the numerous
crimes against humanity for which he’s undoubtedly responsible. Almost
certainly it’s the fear of such indictments that has kept him in power for so
long, aided and abetted by the military, who are every bit as indictable.
The really big question now is what’s next for
Zimbabwe? The Brits appear to have their fingerprints all over this. What does
the Foreign Office have in mind now? It looks like Mnangagwa is their chosen
successor, for the interim at least, but who will they be pushing forward in
the imminent general elections? Technically, Mnangagwa, who appears to be a
very nasty piece of work, has no right to the job – as he was fired from the
role of Vice President. So the very first thing he should be doing is calling new
elections.
It might be worth keeping an eye on Patrick
Chinamasa, a previous ally of Mugabe who has served as finance minister and is
currently head of “cyber security” – someone who should be fairly well placed
to hear about any plans to arrest generals coming back from China. According to
ZI, he’s recently been busily jet-setting around the world, visiting
influential “think tanks” such as Britain’s Chatham House.
Grace Mugabe has been scapegoated in this story,
and like most things, it’s hard to know where the truth really lies. But the
fact that she and this so-called G40 group seemed to want to overthrow the old
regime, and have been “descended on” by the army, just makes me wonder if the
old regime has really been defeated. Unquestionably the army will be very
concerned about themselves, and are unlikely to support anyone who might send a
few of them off to The Hague along with Comrade Bob. Given that the army were
so worried about the possibility of Grace coming to power just makes me wonder
if the right “criminals” have been “descended on”.
I know it’s an impossible dream, but I just hope
someone takes a lesson from Costa Rica’s history and takes this opportunity to
scrap the army altogether.
On the day Mugabe resigned the BBC was interviewing
various ecstatic people in Harare. One of these, whose name I’ve unfortunately
forgotten, was a lovely young woman who has been an opposition activist for
some years – and has the scars to prove it. At the end of her interview she was
asked a very good question, which went something like this: we know about all
the bad things Mugabe did, but can you tell me two good things about him –
after all this is the man who ended British colonial rule in Zimbabwe? Her
answer was superb. She said that the fact he ended white minority rule was
indeed one good thing; but the other was to provide an excellent example of
what not to do – meaning that as Zimbabwe charts its new course it may not have
a definite idea of what it wants, but it has a very clear idea of what it
doesn’t want.
John Andrews is a writer and political
activist based in England. Check out John's books: Fiction: The Road to Emily Bay; Non Fiction: The School of Kindness; The People’s Constitution. Read
other articles by John.
This article was
posted on Friday, November 24th, 2017 at 3:42am and is filed under Media, Militarism, Police, Robert Mugabe, UK Media, United Kingdom, Zimbabwe. https://dissidentvoice.org/2017/11/amapondo-zinkomo-phakati-zimbabwe/https://dissidentvoice.org/2017/11/amapondo-zinkomo-phakati-zimbabwe/
No comments:
Post a Comment